Intellectual Property Litigation

In re Droplets, Inc.
Mr. Geyser and the firm were hired by a major software company to challenge a USPTO decision invalidating key claims in two ground-breaking patents. These appeals present fundamental legal issues, and Mr. Geyser will brief and argue those issues in the Federal Circuit.

Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.
With Elizabeth Brannen as counsel of record, the firm was retained to prepare an important cert-stage amicus brief on behalf of leading technology companies. Mr. Geyser played a key role in the briefing, shaping the arguments (and argumentation) for addressing the law of indefiniteness under Section 112 of the Patent Act. (Our Brief)

Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Again with Ms. Brannen as counsel of record, the firm represented a group of leading technology companies at the cert-stage in this important patent case. Mr. Geyser helped craft the brief’s strategies for urging immediate review of the Federal Circuit’s decision, which announced a patent-specific test for direct infringement and vicarious liability.